Category: Uncategorized

Posted on

Support KAS’s conservation work in 2021: Annual Raffle!

Check out our great raffle prizes this year! This is KAS’s one and only fundraiser, and it supports the bulk of our conservation work. We can’t do any of it without you. Please consider participating (and potentially winning some great prizes!).

To participate, click here to download the printable raffle mail-in form!

Dear KAS supporters,

Through this strange and unsettling year of 2020, with the coronavirus compelling us all to stay closer to home, I think many of us have a renewed appreciation for the beauty and vitality of the extraordinary place where we live—from backyard gardens and forests replete with bird songs, to wondrous wild backcountry, big trees, dramatic vistas, unique plants, rushing rivers, and rugged shorelines. This special corner of Oregon that we call home inspires—and needs—our vigilance and stewardship, and so I hope that you will consider a generous donation to the Kalmiopsis Audubon Society (KAS).

Each year we strive to bring you birding and conservation news and to act on your behalf to protect Curry County’s natural environment through strategic local grassroots advocacy on important issues that affect our land, water, wildlife, and communities. For four decades now, I am proud to say, KAS has been the most active and effective local citizens’ organization concerned with habitat conservation issues on the South Coast, and we need your support to keep up our good work.

Over this past year, we’ve advocated for public lands conservation including more protection for our National Wild and Scenic Rivers and the unique botanical and wildlife values of our National Forests. We’ve participated in the Wild Rivers Forest Collaborative and continued survey work for marbled murrelets. We’ve tracked and pressed for the final steps of the Floras Lake land exchange (hopefully to be finalized by year’s end) and for Dark Sky lighting in the city of Port Orford. We’ve monitored local land-use decisions and wildlife policies, and have responded to a wide range of issues affecting our forests, rivers, fish, and wildlife at the local, state, and federal levels. Although we had to cancel our usual field trips, service projects, and kids’ camp this year owing to the coronavirus, we did some educational workshops to train volunteers to help track aerial herbicide spraying. Our award-winning Storm Petrel newsletter was published four times; we’ve sent monthly Hoot-Outs to hundreds of members and friends; and we upgraded our website—a great resource for visitors and residents alike—to be mobile-friendly. Finally, with an eye to the future in this 40th anniversary year, we launched our Nest Egg Club, a planned giving program that aims to lay the foundation for continued conservation of our special place for many years to come.

Kalmiopsis Audubon relies on this one November fundraising appeal and membership dues for our operating expenses, which allow for a whole range of volunteer activism and activities. This is the one time each year that we reach out to you for financial support. And following in our annual tradition, we are offering another funRAFFLE to make giving more fun! Please see a description of this year’s exciting and enticing prizes on the back of this page.

I hope that you will choose to give generously to KAS by buying raffle tickets and/or by sending a donation above the cost of the tickets. Thank you for being a part of our group and for supporting Kalmiopsis Audubon as a voice for conservation and the environment in southwest Oregon.

Stay safe and healthy, and best wishes for a joyful and wondrous holiday season!

Ann Vileisis, President, Kalmiopsis Audubon Society

Posted on

Fall 2020 Conservation News

Port Orford’s Dark Sky, update

KAS has continued to participate in the City of Port Orford’s effort to upgrade its “Dark Sky” outdoor lighting code to account for changes in technology. The basic principle of “dark sky” lighting is to point lights down or properly shield them to reduce sky glow and light trespass into other people’s yards. However, new LED fixtures pose new challenges, requiring us all to learn a new language of illumination. Watts remain the energy required per second; lumens are the measure of light output (brightness); and kelvins describe a light’s “color temperature” on a scale, with 2700 kelvins (k) describing the warmest LED fixtures (the color of incandescent bulbs), to 3000k (cool white), to 3200k (florescent bulb-like) and beyond, with lights rated at 4000k and above having blue elements experienced as extremely cool and bright.

While LED fixtures are excellent for conserving electricity, lights that are too blue and bright can have unintended impacts to human health and wildlife. Reports from the American Medical Association (AMA) have raised concerns about possible adverse effects of shorter wavelength blue light that can adversely suppress melatonin during night. According to the AMA, recent large surveys found brighter residential nighttime lighting associated with reduced sleep times, dissatisfaction with sleep quality, excessive sleepiness, impaired daytime functioning and obesity. The AMA concluded that communities should be careful “to minimize and control blue-rich environmental lighting by using the lowest emission of blue light possible” and recommended using fixtures no higher than 3,000k. Beyond human health, studies have found impacts of excessively bright lights on birds, wildlife, pollinating insects, and more. The capacity for new LED fixtures to emit such bright, blue glaring light prompted KAS to urge a cap on kelvins.

This has particular relevance for the streetlights on Highway 101. ODOT has plans to repave and re-line Highway 101 through Port Orford and says it must now must apply national crosswalk safety standards. This will require 6 new pairs of lights mounted on 30-foot poles, taller than what we currently have (a motley collection from 20-28ft). The small town of Port Orford has low pedestrian use and low traffic at night. We’ve long had crosswalks without lights, and so many have questioned whether new lights are truly needed, worried that our main street will end up looking like a Walmart parking lot. ODOT’s answer is simply that all cross walks now need to meet national safety standards.

Other coastal cities have met the safety requirements by footing the sizable bill for greater numbers of low, decorative lights, but Port Orford doesn’t have the budget or inclination for that. Initially, the ODOT lighting design called for 3,000k lights. Fortunately, in response to strong public concern, ODOT’s engineer has now approved use of warm lights (2700k) with full cut-off fixtures to meet Port Orford’s  “dark sky” goals as long as lights can be mounted high on the 30-foot poles, but it remains unclear whether Coos-Curry Electric Coop will be able and willing to source these Dark-Sky compliant fixtures. They say not all fixtures can stand up to coastal conditions. KAS has pressed for use of warm colored lights and has also asked city council to urge ODOT to consider other options for pedestrian safety, such as lights that come on only when someone needs to use a crosswalk.

In August, the Port Orford Planning Commission (PC) passed its upgraded outdoor lighting ordinance and recommended it to the City Council (CC), which voted unanimously to pass it in September. But then, during a “second reading,” CC members decided to make some changes to address concerns about placement of security lights and how fines would be levied. Owing to outstanding questions related to the ODOT required lights on Highway 101, the CC has sent the code back to the PC and is now waiting for answers before considering a final version. A huge thanks to all KAS members who are helping to work on this issue. It’s not over yet, so if you want to help, please send me an email.

Salmon on the South Coast

ODFW is currently developing a plan to manage several fisheries on the South Coast. The public process has been limited this time primarily to angler stakeholders with the exception of the Lower Rogue Watershed Council, but KAS has participated to advocate for the local species that are not fished (threatened coho), for birds unfairly vilified (cormorants) because they are fish predators, and for stronger consideration of climate change impacts to our local fish runs. SONCC coho are a threatened species that has already been reduced to perilously low levels, and ODFW scientists have identified that our cherished rivers will come under far greater stresses with climate change, including lower flows and higher water temperatures.

This new plan will deal with steelhead, coho, and cutthroat trout from Elk River south (2 other plans deal with chinook and rivers from Elk north) and aims to specify “harvest” levels and hatchery output, as well as some goals for habitat improvement. Some fish conservation groups are pressing ODFW to allow anglers to harvest steelhead only if there is sufficient monitoring and data to demonstrate that populations can handle fishing pressure. There has also been discussion about the need to evaluate both harvest goals and hatchery programs in light of climate challenges, recognizing that natural origin fish will have greater genetic capacity to adapt to new conditions. Planning ahead for how we will have resilient salmon and steelhead populations and fisheries into the future will likely require a more precautionary approach from ODFW.

If ODFW doesn’t take climate change seriously in all aspects of its work, it will be harder to ask individuals who own riverfront properties to actively engage in the river stewardship and restoration activities that will also be critical, such as conserving water if you tap into groundwater or river flows for irrigation or lawn watering, planting trees and native plants that can help provide shade to cool the water temperature, or allowing beavers to recolonize in tributary streams. If you are a riverfront property owner and want to help to do more to help our rivers prepare for climate change, contact Curry Watersheds Partnership ((541) 247-2755, ext. 0), to learn more. Also, if you are new to our area, you may not be aware that Curry County has a “Riparian Buffer Corridor Overlay Zone” (50-75 feet from rivers and streams, depending on flow) that prohibits permanent clearing of riparian vegetation, a policy that helps to protect water quality and fish habitat. It’s going to take us all supporting conservation policies and restoration of riparian habitats if we want to keep our birds and fish into the future.

Oregon’s Rocky Habitat Plan update

The state of Oregon is currently updating and revising its policies to protect rocky coastal habitat areas for the first time in 25 years. Rocky coastal habitats include offshore rocks and islands, tidepools, and headlands—features that provide natural beauty but also outsized ecological values to so many creatures that depend on them for food and shelter, from unique invertebrates to our beloved black oystercatchers and turnstones.

The Rocky Habitat Management Strategy will provide for three new types of protective designations—Marine Conservation, Marine Gardens (focusing on education), and Marine Research— to safeguard these unique habitats into the future.

To develop the new Rocky Habitat Management Strategy, the state of Oregon has asked citizens and communities to nominate rocky sites that deserve protection. At this point community groups have formed up and down the coast and are in the process of developing substantial, site-specific proposals based on input received earlier this summer. Full proposals, which will go to state agencies and decision-making bodies for review, are due at the end of the year.

On the South Coast, Shoreline Education for Awareness, South Coast Rocky Shores Group, Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans, based at Oregon State University (PISCO), the Oregon Kelp Alliance, and Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition have taken the lead to develop site specific proposals for Coquille Point, Blacklock Point, Cape Blanco, part of Port Orford Heads, Rocky Point, and Crook Point.

You can help support these designations by writing letters of support, sharing observations about proposed sites you regularly visit, and participating in community meetings to support the site designation process (currently being held online). To learn more about sites being considered for designations in our area, and how you can get involved, please contact CoastWatch Volunteer Coordinator Jesse Jones (503-989-7244, jesse@oregonshores.org). 

More information on the Rocky Habitat Management Strategy, which nests within the state’s Territorial Sea Plan, can be found at: https://www.oregonocean.info/index.php/tsp-rocky-shores-amendment. 

Shasta-Agness Project

In late July, the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest released the Record of Decision for its “Shasta-Agness Landscape Restoration Project,” a plan that will guide management of nearly 7,000 acres of public lands in the vicinity of Agness. The idea for this project started many years ago, with Forest Service planners and the Forest Collaborative aiming to find common ground on logging that could provide timber but also accomplish conservation goals, such as restoring oak savannas, while supporting recreation opportunities.

Owing to fire suppression, the landscape around Agness in particular has been shifting from oak savanna vegetation to Douglas firs. But the warming climate may now be making it harder for Douglas firs to thrive in thin soils. Already some have died owing to persistent drought. According to Forest Service, thinning in areas with encroaching firs, plus prescribed fires, could help shift the ecosystem back to white oaks; then revenues generated from timber could fund positive conservation actions such as replacing old culverts and decommissioning old logging roads that still spill sediment into tributaries. However, one controversial aspect of this plan is to log some firs in LSR (Late-seral reserve) areas that are now more than 80 years old –and so already well on the way to providing the kind of big tree habitat that is more resistant to fire and that is needed by some forest birds and wildlife. The plan includes 3,770 acres of commercial logging in oak woodlands, pine forests, and riparian zones.

This project, like all public-lands projects, has gone through a NEPA public process designed to identify environmental impacts and consider different options. (NEPA is the National Environmental Planning Act.) KAS has submitted comments through the entire public process. We supported thinning of plantations (already logged areas that are now thick and fire-prone) and all actions related to stream restoration. We supported restoration of oak savannas but urged a cautious approach, especially with regards to hazards of invasive plants taking over in the wake of logging, questioning the feasibility of how prescribed burns could actually be implemented, and asking for more explicit plans for how restoration will actually be accomplished after logging is done and underscoring the need for adaptive management, since this type of restoration is new to this area. We questioned the need for commercial logging in riparian areas and serpentine pine areas, where mineralized soils already create a mosaic of habitat. In addition, we asked for more careful consideration of how recent wildfires affected the larger landscape of southwest Oregon, pointing out that the forest habitat still standing in the vicinity of Agness may now be all the more important for birds and wildlife, including the coastal marten, that have dispersed from the large areas burned in the Chetco Bar and Klondike Fires.

With the Final Record of Decision, we were disappointed that our main concerns were not adequately addressed. We submitted objections raising concern about several aspects of the project: commercial logging in Riparian Reserves and serpentine pine areas, the likely increase of invasive species in oak savanna restoration areas; and the short timeline of the project over a large area, which precludes the ability to actually apply the promised “adaptive management” approach. In short, it’s hard to shift gears and adapt management to new information after all the trees have been cut. Objections were considered at a meeting in late October. In early September, the coastal marten was designated as a federally threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. We hope this will require the Forest Service to make some adjustments to its plan. The last major timber management plan in our area, “Coastal Healthy Forest Treatments,” focused on plantation thinning and has guided the direction of local timber sales for over ten years. This plan has scheduled timber sales over the next 4 years.

Protecting forest waters

Over the past several years, Teresa Bird has headed up KAS efforts to help local citizens and communities better understand and find out about aerial spraying on nearby private timberlands. As we’ve come to learn, Oregon’s Forest Practices law is weak, with only narrow buffers from logging and spraying to protect fish-bearing streams and no buffers to protect smaller non-fish bearing streams, even those that flow into drinking water sources. Earlier this year, we hosted an online training to help volunteers learn how to monitor for spraying through the state’s aerial spraying notification program (FERNS).

I am pleased to report a positive outcome from these efforts. Through monitoring of the Hubbard Creek watershed, which supplies drinking water for the city of Port Orford, Teresa identified an upcoming timber sale and spray in the North Fork. She alerted the local Port Orford Watershed Council. The Council was then able to reach out to the landowner to request that the logging company leave a buffer around the stream and avoid aerial herbicide spraying. Because this stream is both non-perennial and non-fish bearing, there are absolutely no requirements to leave buffer trees or to avoid spraying, even though it flows into a public drinking water supply. In the end, the company agreed with a handshake to leave a 20-foot buffer and to use only manual application of herbicides. The Chair of the Port Orford Watershed Council went out with the company to flag the buffer zone. Kudos to the Port Orford Watershed Council for negotiating this positive deal for Port Orford’s water drinkers!

In the absence of meaningful reform of the Oregon Forest Practices Act, continued vigilance by citizens will be needed to protect the streams that flow through Oregon’s private timberlands, many of which are now owned by real estate investment companies. If you’d like to help us monitor for local aerial sprays, please contact Teresa at teresa@kalmiopsisaudubon.org

Marbled Murrelet Surveys Continue by Teresa Bird

This summer I continued to look for murrelets in our nearby coastal forests with the help of Max Beeken. The most exciting surveys this year were along the South Fork Sixes River, where Max and I both saw an amazing amount of murrelet activity on both sides of the river! I also heard many of the murrelet’s distinctive keer! calls from all around me during a survey about a third of the way up the Humbug Mountain trail. While we usually focus our survey efforts in the forest surrounding Elk River, this year we also helped Coast Range Forest Watch survey a proposed timber sale on the Board of Forestry lands in the Elliott State Forest. The many combined murrelet sightings from our surveys in the area effectively confirmed that the area was being used by murrelets, and the timber sale was halted by the Oregon Department of Forestry. Thanks to the National Audubon Society for a grant that helped to fund this survey effort!

Posted on

Conservation News, Summer 2020

Port Orford Dark Sky lighting

On Tuesday August 11 at 3:30pm, the Port Orford Planning Commission (PC) will have its final hearing on the city’s new outdoor lighting ordinance. Last year, the City Council directed the Commission to update the old ordinance to reflect new advances in lighting technology (eg. LEDs) and to tighten language to make it more enforceable. KAS has attended monthly meetings over the past year as the PC has worked to upgrade the ordinance, drawing upon municipal ordinances from other small towns. Once the ordinance is passed at the official hearing in August, it will be referred to the City Council. 

It will be helpful for KAS members and other citizens in Port Orford to participate in the PC meeting, probably via zoom, and even more important, in the subsequent City Council meetings to voice support for the new ordinance. I will let everyone know more via our HOOT OUT about meeting call-in information when it becomes available. 

As long-time members know, Kalmiopsis Audubon, under the leadership of board member Al Geiser, has been involved for more than two decades in efforts to conserve the dark night sky in Port Orford—from installing “night caps” to getting the first “dark sky” ordinance passed. The gist is that light fixtures need to be pointed down to reduce light trespass (onto neighbor’s property) and also to avoid pink sky glare. Bright light at night can be harmful to human health, can be disruptive to birds and wildlife, and diminish the beauty of the night sky and our ability to enjoy sights like the recent Neowise Comet. Please talk to your neighbors and friends about the value of conserving the night sky and the benefits of a sensible lighting ordinance. For more background, see: www.kalmiopsisaudubon.org/dark-sky

Jordan Cove project update

In the last Petrel, we reported that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), had approved the Jordan Cove LNG facility and pipeline, despite the fact that the Canadian company Pembina, had not yet qualified for state permits needed to move forward. Shortly thereafter, landowners whose property would be condemned by eminent domain for pipeline construction—plus community groups, conservation groups, and tribes—filed lawsuits against the decision. In mid-June, the state of Oregon submitted its own petition to challenge the project since the FERC seemed intent to totally preempt the state’s critical roles in permitting under the Clean Water Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act.

In early July, around the same time that several other large energy pipelines were struck down by court decisions (Dakota Access and Keystone XL) or cancelled owing to the declining market for natural gas (Atlantic Coast), the Trump administration went ahead and approved gas exports from the Jordan Cove facility, further signaling disdain for state environmental laws and its intent to keep pushing oil and gas production, despite mounting scientific concerns about fossil fuels damaging our climate and a marked downturn in the natural gas market. 

Our organization has long opposed this proposal because of its promotion of fossil fuels at a time of climate crisis, condemnations of private property owned by rural landowners, hundreds of pipeline crossings of our fine southern Oregon rivers and tributaries, infringement on irreplaceable forest and estuary habitat for birds, fish, and wildlife, and threats to public safety, water quality, and commercial and sport fisheries. We’ve helped at the local level, with our members showing up at hearings in Coos Bay. [Breaking news is that Oregon’s Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) has just denied Pembina a key local land use permit, too.] At this point, the fate of the pipeline will lie mostly in the hands of the federal courts, but Governor Kate Brown will continue to play an important role to make sure state laws are followed.

ACTION ITEM: Please thank Oregon Governor Kate Brown for her leadership thus far. Make a quick phone call (503) 378-4582); make a comment via her email portal; or send a note with a message like this: Dear Governor Brown, Thank you for challenging FERC’s approval of the Jordan Cove LNG facility and pipeline and for voicing your commitment to make sure all state laws are followed. I appreciate your standing up for citizens of Oregon. (personalize or add reasons!) Snail mail address: Governor Kate Brown, 900 Court Street NE, Suite 254, Salem, OR 97301-4047.

Floras Lake exchange update

In early June, I attended a Curry Board of Commissioners (BOC) meeting (with a mask!), aiming to keep the Floras Lake Land exchange on track. As stipulated by the land swap agreement finalized by the BOC last fall, the county must vacate the roads and right of ways in its parcel. Yet again, there was a delay, this time owing to a disagreement between the county assessor and attorney over the format of the order. Ultimately, two weeks later, the BOC passed the final order unanimously. However, around the same time, Oregon State Parks announced massive staffing cuts owing to a huge budget shortfall related to the pandemic reducing revenues from camping and lottery. Despite pandemic and budgetary chaos, we’ll need to make sure the final steps of the exchange are completed to close the deal before the agreement expires at year’s end. 

A Tragedy in Progress: Elk River Chinook update

Over the past several years, we’ve tracked the troubling situation with the wild (also called natural origin) Elk River fall Chinook. In 2013, we were shocked when ODFW determined that wild Elk River fall chinook run was the only non-viable chinook run on the entire coast and that our fish had an alarmingly high risk of extinction (16.9 %). Owing to questions about older data used in the 2013 population viability analysis, ODFW recently completed a new one, with far more alarming results. According to the new population viability analysis, Elk River fall Chinook have a 97 percent risk of extinction over the next one hundred years, under the most likely scenario, with current climate and fishing conditions.

This situation is utterly tragic because the Elk River has been renowned for its salmon habitat, with a highly intact forested watershed that Jim Rogers and so many of us have worked hard to protect, plus an undeveloped mouth (though there is a lack of adequate summer rearing habitat in the lower river), and positive restoration efforts underway for coho that will also benefit chinook. Most all other fall chinook runs up and down the coast have extinction risks less than 5%, typically considered the threshold for concern.

What’s gone so wrong at Elk River? A key problem is hatchery interactions. Because the local hatchery has pumped so many smolts into our small river over the past 50 years (>325k annually until a few years ago, and upwards of 500k in decades past), there has been too much interbreeding between wild and domesticated hatchery fish. Because too many hatchery fish are not caught and do not return into the hatchery, the unfortunate outcome is that natural- origin fish now have depressed productivity.

Wild fish that have returned to Elk River for hundreds of thousands of years are adapted to river conditions. Hatchery fish are adapted best for life in a hatchery through epigenetic changes (also called domestication), but when they interbreed with wild fish, the result is offspring that are less fit and less productive. Imagine breeding chihuahuas with wolves—the outcome would be offspring less capable of surviving in the wild. 

Since 2013, ODFW has taken some actions to try to reduce the crisis of interbreeding of wild and hatchery salmon. Aiming to reduce the number of hatchery fish spawning in the wild, ODFW reduced smolt output by 50k, and fixed the hatchery pump and fish ladders. These actions have slightly improved the situation. In addition, the Oregon Hatchery Research Center has been studying the strategy of adding a special scent to hatchery water during incubation with hopes of better drawing returning fish back into the hatchery. After many years of study, 2020 was the first year the new scent was added to chinook incubation water; we’ll not really know how well it works for another 3 to 7 years.

But ODFW’s new population viability analysis indicating up to a 97 percent risk of extinction for fall Chinook in Elk River raises serious alarm bells. How much longer do we wait to see what happens—especially since questions have been raised about this problem since at least 2005? The 2013 Coastal Multi-Species Management Plan stipulated that ODFW must revisit the situation with Elk River chinook in 2021. 

The Elk River hatchery was built not to mitigate for lost habitat but as a way to “enhance” sport fishing. That was back in 1969 when people were unaware of the insidious risks that hatcheries posed to wild fish runs. Instead of enhancing our sport fish run, it appears this very oversized hatchery program is now putting our local wild chinook run into a dangerously unsustainable position. This is not theoretical. Over the past few years, with poor ocean conditions, there have been years with extremely poor returns of hatchery fish, years with no bubble fishery for Chinook off the river’s mouth, and this year there will no longer be retention of wild fish for sport anglers. 

To build ecosystem resilience in the face of climate change—or even earthquakes—we need for our fall Chinook to be able to evolve with changing conditions, and the locally adapted native Elk River fish will be far better suited to that task than their domesticated hatchery cousins. Ultimately, to conserve our locally adapted fish into the future, we will need to reduce the smolt output and right-size the hatchery program for our small river. Stay tuned. 

Calling for more Wild and Scenic Rivers

Last fall, Senator Ron Wyden put out a call to citizens throughout the state to nominate more Oregon rivers to be designated in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers system. In response, Kalmiopsis Audubon nominated a number of important tributaries to our local rivers. Wild and Scenic designation most notably prohibits dams, but it also affords greater protection through the requirement that public land agencies plan and manage to conserve the rivers’ “outstandingly remarkable values.” To follow up on our advocacy for the Southwest Oregon Mineral Withdrawal, we nominated public land tributaries of Hunter Creek and Pistol River and the North Fork Smith. We also nominated some outstanding tributaries of the lower Rogue, the Sixes, and the Chetco. 

As long time KAS members know, our region currently has one of the highest concentrations of wild and scenic rivers in America—and the designations have helped to conserve water quality, fish habitat, ecological values, and recreational opportunities in our public lands. Senator Wyden’s wild rivers initiative has understandably been delayed owing to the pandemic and its economic fallout, but we expect the Senator will press forward with this project as soon as he can. We are also hope he’ll continue his efforts to make the Southwest Oregon Mineral Withdrawal permanent. 

ACTION ITEM: To help, please call (202) 224-5244/ (541) 858-5122 —or send Senator Wyden a short note (via his website portal) with this message: Thanks for your efforts to advance the Southwest Oregon Mineral withdrawal legislation and to protect more Wild and Scenic Rivers in Southwest Oregon (you can add in your favorites and otherwise personalize!). 

ODFW proposes and drops new Rogue River Bear hunt

In mid-July, ODFW announced a proposal for a new black bear hunt in the Wild and Scenic Rogue River canyon—the one place in Oregon where it’s been off limits since 1965. A week later the proposal was dropped owing to strong public opposition. 

The agency’s primary aim was to address an issue with so-called “problem bears” that have become habituated to human foods, improperly stored by campers who hike and raft in the Wild & Scenic Rogue River canyon. Black bears generally mind their own business and have ample wild foods to eat (except for in some drought years), but periodically, managing bears in the Rogue canyon has been a challenge. In years past, some lodges and campers backpacking and rafting the river neglected to take sufficient care with food and trash storage, with the unfortunate effect of drawing in bears. There is an old truism: a fed bear is a dead bear. 

About 20 years ago, citizen groups and public land and wildlife agencies pulled together and came up with a partial solution: for river campers to use mini-electric fences to store food at campsites known for bear problems. This approach worked relatively well for many years, but owing to a delay in putting out the food storage fences last year, there was a season of especially troubling interactions between campers and bears. ODFW and public land agencies have also tried to educate campers about proper food storage, but there is no requirement, or even a recommendation, for hikers or boaters to use bear proof storage containers, as required in so many other wilderness areas with high bear activity.

The good news is that this year, fences went in early and problems have lessened, but it remains critically important that Rogue River campers and hikers take personal responsibility to store their food and trash properly—and for ODFW and public lands agencies to redouble their efforts to educate the public about proper food and trash storage. In many other places where there have been conflicts between people and bears, proper storage of food and trash has been the key to reducing problematic interactions. 

This is critical to recognize in storing food and trash at home, too. Curry Transfer and Recycling (CTR) recently offered new bear-proof trash cans to its customers. They were so popular that CTR is already out of stock! The containers have a special lock that is automatically opened when trash is retrieved. If you are interested in getting one of these bear-proof trash cans (also good for wind), call CTR (541-469-2425) and ask to be placed on the waiting list. They expect to get them in again next year. Also, please pay attention to bird feeders and pull them down for a while if you suspect bear activity.

National environmental rollbacks, finally coming to fruition

Those who follow national environmental news know that the current Administration has been on a determined path to rollback many laws intended to safeguard public health, wildlife, and nature. Unfortunately, in mid-July, the Trump Administration finalized rules to weaken the most fundamental law, the National Environmental Policy Act, known by its acronym NEPA. For fifty years, NEPA has required that federal agencies consider environmental consequences, and alternatives, before they take actions. The law also provides for transparency in federal decision making and public input from citizens. From local experience, we know public input is critically important because sometimes agency staffers (which come and go) lack crucial knowledge or perspective or are subject to political pressures. 

The new rule gives federal agencies broad discretion to exempt certain projects from NEPA and to avoid consideration of cumulative and indirect impacts, though the law’s statutory language requires such consideration. What this means locally is yet to be seen. The Forest Service may start to fast track projects through the new streamlined regulatory process. Though the rule change will purportedly fast-track approvals for pipelines, mines, logging, and oil drilling, it will no doubt be litigated, which may well lead to more delays. 

Migratory Bird Treaty Act rollback proceeding apace

The Trump Administration has also targeted an even more longstanding bedrock conservation law. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) has been in effect since 1918, when leaders in the U.S. and Canada recognized the important value of migratory birds to the economies and enjoyment of all citizens. Treaty protection was soon expanded to include Mexico, Japan, and Russia. For a century, the threat of MBTA prosecution had served to deter those who would harm birds. 

That changed in 2018 when the Trump Administration decided to “celebrate” the 100th anniversary of this critical law by issuing a new legal opinion that effectively gutted it. Under this new interpretation, the MBTA forbids only intentional killing, such as hunting without a permit, and no longer applies to industries that inadvertently kill a whole lot of birds, such as the oil and gas industry (with their toxic wastewater pits and oil spills), communications and wind power (with their towers), and fishing (with long lines). To be clear, many of these industries, to comply with the MBTA, had already adopted bird friendly practices that have no doubt saved the lives of millions of birds. In addition, financial penalties imposed under the MBTA have helped recover species harmed by reckless negligence, such as the Exxon Valdez and Deepwater Horizon oil spills.

In response to the Trump Administration’s rollback of the MBTA, a bi-partisan group of former wildlife officials from previous presidential administrations (going back to Nixon) sent a letter strongly urging reinstatement of traditional rules. Shortly thereafter, a bipartisan group of Congress members, led by California Rep. Alan Lowenthal introduced a bill to close the loophole and restore the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Our Congressman, Peter DeFazio, was one of the original co-sponsors of this bill, H.R. 5552. In March, a group of 23 Senators, including Senators Wyden and Merkley, sent a letter, strongly urging the Secretary of the Interior to reconsider the Administration’s decision, calling it “the most significant rollback of migratory bird protections in our nation’s history.” 

Nevertheless, the Trump Administration has pressed ahead. KAS recently joined with other Audubon chapters in Oregon (and across America), to comment on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to oppose the damaging rule change. 

So far, HR 5552 has moved ahead with a markup in the House Natural Resources Committee, but it has not yet been referred for a full House vote. Honestly, the bill has little chance of passage with the current political configuration, but it’s heartening to know that our elected officials are fighting to keep the MBTA intact. It’s important that they know we care and appreciate their efforts to stand up against rollbacks to environmental protection laws. 

ACTION ITEM: Please give our federal elected officials a call (or send an email via their website portals) to thank them for standing up against rollbacks to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and other bedrock environmental protection laws. 

Rep. DeFazio (202)-225-6416/541-269-2609

Sen. Merkley: (202) 224-3753/541-608-9102

Sen. Wyden: (202) 224-5244/ 541-858-5122

Cormorants under siege again

In tandem with rolling back the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the Trump Administration has also pursued a new rule that specifically targets Double Crested Cormorants, one of the most persecuted birds in the United States. The new rule would allow killing of more than 120,000 birds each year. Based on current estimates, this could potentially result in the annual killing of up to 14% of the national population and represents nearly a 140% increase over the average annual take between 2007 and 2018. The rule would also turn over jurisdiction for management of these birds over to state wildlife agencies.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) already has a poor record of protecting this species. You may recall that the agency permitted killing nearly 11,000 cormorants and destroying more than 28,000 nests at in the Columbia River Estuary, resulting in the complete collapse of this colony, which represented 40% of the entire Double-crested Cormorant population west of the Rocky Mountains.

However, we are concerned that turning over cormorant management to states with such high ceilings for lethal take could be far worse. State agencies are already strapped for funds to manage non-game species, and we know that ODFW managers are frequently pressured by fishermen to kill or haze cormorants in order to reduce competition for fish. KAS joined other Audubon chapters in Oregon and around the U.S. to submit comments opposing this overreaching proposal that flies in the face of 100 years of federal bird protection policy. 

Help Monitor for Aerial Spraying on the Curry County Coast!

For the last few years, KAS has been helping our community to better understand and find out about aerial herbicide spraying on timberlands. You may have already heard that the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) has an online notification system called FERNS, which will send emails to notify subscribers about pending chemical applications in particular areas. Our goal is to recruit KAS members who can use FERNS to help us monitor sprays in all the watersheds on the Curry County coastline. Basically, all you need to do is sign up and start paying attention. We are looking for volunteers who can cover watersheds north of Elk River (eg Floras Creek, Sixes River), South of Hubbard’s Creek to Gold Beach (eg Euchre Creek, Lobster Creek), and in the Brookings area (we just got some great volunteers to monitor Hunter Creek and Pistol River – thank you!!). Having better information about aerial spraying in our communities can help us advocate for better practices, and it can enable you to better protect your and your neighbors’ health and wellbeing. If you are interested to help, please contact Teresa Bird: teresa@kalmiopsisaudubon@org.

Posted on

Conservation News – Spring 2020

Langlois Asphalt Plant Proposal, Withdrawn

In February, KAS submitted comments regarding a proposed asphalt processing plant in Langlois, south and across highway 101 from the KOA campground. While we recognize the need for locations where rock can be stockpiled and made into asphalt from time to time, this proposal was clearly out of compliance with county ordinances. The project proponent claimed “temporary” use but, in fact, was trying to get blanket permission to make asphalt at the site, on and off, indefinitely. KAS also pointed out the need for state air quality permits and called for special conditions to protect riparian areas from runoff since threatened coastal coho spawn right in the reach of Swanson Creek (a tributary to Floras Lake) that runs through the property. The Oregon Coast Alliance also submitted comments in opposition, and several citizens from Langlois attended the Curry Planning Commission meeting to voice their concerns about noise and noxious fumes. The application was withdrawn.

Local Action for Inaction on the Climate Crisis

Earlier this year, the Oregon Legislature again considered a cap-trade-and invest bill (SB 1530) as a way to start tackling the global climate crisis. The cap, trade, and invest approach would cap emissions, set up a system to charge for and trade emission credits, and use proceeds to start investing in infrastructure, technology and restoration needed to adapt to climate change, especially in Oregon’s rural areas. To be clear, there have been debates for decades about the pros and cons of cap and invest versus a carbon tax versus regulation. Each approach has pros and cons, but at this point, with the ever-growing urgency of the climate crisis, it was time to make a decision and move ahead.

It didn’t happen. The group “Timber Unity” organized a rally in opposition, with hundreds of big trucks driving around the capitol. The group claims to be grassroots, representing loggers, truckdrivers and others whose livelihoods depend on extraction, but its major donors, no surprise, include corporate logging interests. As a result, for the second year in a row, despite many compromises made in the bill, the minority party Republican senators walked out, leaving a lack of quorum for any action.

While this was happening in Salem, county commissioners organized in rural counties—to back-up Timber Unity and Republican legislators—by passing resolutions opposing the climate bill. When Curry County considered such a resolution in early February, KAS board member Tim Palmer attended, urging the Curry Board of Commissioners (BOC) to not pass the resolution that assured more gridlock but instead to offer support for some constructive way forward. He explained how rural areas will be hardest hit by the climate crisis—that acidifying and warming oceans will affect our local fisheries, that rising sea level will affect our roads and towns, and that higher temperatures and lower humidity will amplify wildfire threats. He pointed to changes in the bill specifically intended to provide for investment in rural areas to start addressing these issues. Local leaders from Curry Democrats also asked the BOC to hold off on the resolution and instead hold a workshop to consider pros and cons more carefully. In the end, two commissioners, Chris Paasch and Court Boice, voted to support the resolution, while Commissioner Sue Gold voted to hold a workshop to learn more. We appreciate Commissioner Gold’s thoughtful response to this critical issue.

It’s deeply unfortunate that the climate crisis has become such a partisan and paralyzing issue to our society. Ultimately, in response to the legislature’s failure, Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order 20-04, pressing state agencies to take actions within her administrative purview to reduce emissions. This happened right before the covid-19 outbreak came to dominate everyone’s attention, but the EO should initiate some meaningful changes. Please call Governor Brown to thank her for moving forward to address the climate crisis: (503) 378-4582.

Jordan Cove Update

Many of you heard news in mid-March that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved the Jordan Cove facility for the north shore of Coos Bay. This was hugely disappointing but not surprising. Though the FERC is supposed to be an independent, bipartisan body, the current administration stacked it with its own pro-development Republican appointees and neglected to follow longstanding tradition to appoint another Democrat for balance. In the wake of this “rigged” FERC decision, Senator Wyden joined Senator Merkley and Rep. DeFazio in condemning the project. Despite FERC approval, the state of Oregon has denied Jordan Cove several key permits, including for dredging. Meanwhile, natural gas prices have been dropping precipitously, so the economics of this project are in limbo. In mid-April, a coalition of groups and tribes, as well as Oregon state agencies, asked FERC to withdraw or re-hear its decision, on grounds that the decision process was procedurally flawed and violated multiple federal environmental laws.

Jordan Cove and the Pacific Connector gas pipeline would cross 400 streams in southern Oregon (including the Rogue), condemn thousands of acres of private property, degrade the Coos Bay estuary, and become Oregon’s largest carbon emitter—all so a Canadian corporation can export natural gas to Asia at a time when we need to reduce emissions. Despite the FERC decision, this house of cards may be starting to collapse. Stay tuned. 

Floras Lake Land Swap

I am glad to report that on April 1, the Curry BOC voted unanimously to take next steps to advance the Floras lake land swap. The agreement made last fall between Curry County and Oregon State Parks had stipulated that platted road right-of-ways be vacated before the swap could proceed. The Curry BOC directed the road-master to proceed with this necessary “vacation.” We’re grateful to Commissioners Sue Gold, Court Boice, and Chris Paasch for keeping the ball rolling on this matter. 

Protecting Forest Waters

In mid-February, KAS sponsored an educational program in Port Orford about grassroots efforts to press for increased protections for streams that flow through industrial forest land. Logging on private industrial forests is governed by the Oregon’s State Forest Practices Act, which has come under increasing criticism for lagging behind other states. In particular, buffers to protect streams and communities from aerial spraying and logging are woefully inadequate. Grassroots groups up and down the coast were planning a ballot initiative effort to finally put these issues before voters. KAS had intended to help with this important effort. But then, upping the stakes considerably, the timber industry put forth its own set of ballot initiatives, including one that would require the state to compensate private landowners for any future changes in regulations. Ultimately, the governor’s office negotiated an agreement between statewide environmental groups and big timber companies to withdraw all ballot initiatives so that some compromise could be made through the legislature. However, the walk-out of Republican senators nixed the possibility of this agreement leading to legislation.

In early April, parties to the agreement re-iterated interest to Governor Brown in working toward a compromise rather than proceeding with the ballot initiatives. Of course, the covid-19 epidemic has made collecting signatures impossible. At this point, everyone recognizes the need for reform, but we don’t yet know what form it will take or if it will go far enough without broader citizen input.

Regardless of the uncertainties, we felt it was important to keep sharing information about these issues that affect so many of our members who live in watersheds predominantly managed for industrial timber production. At our program, assistant conservation director Teresa Bird gave an excellent talk describing the impacts of aerial spraying of herbicides on forests and the shortcomings of Oregon’s rules. She shared maps showing the extent of spraying planned for local areas this spring and explained how people could use the Oregon Department of Forestry’s FERNS program to sign up for notifications, and then make calls to spray applicators to get more information.  

We’d hoped to be able to sponsor workshops in Gold Beach and Brookings, too, but, of course, covid-19 has prompted us to cancel all programs. Still we’d like to reach out to our members in watersheds most likely to be affected by aerial spraying this spring—including Floras Creek, Sixes, Hubbard Creek, Euchre Creek, Hunter Creek and Pistol River— to help everyone become better informed about how to keep safe and to better track what is happening. We’ll be in touch about this via email HOOT OUTs, or for more information about how you can help please contact Teresa Bird at kalmiopsisaudubon@gmail.com.

Posted on

Conservation News – Winter 2020

by Ann Vileisis

Wild Rivers Headwaters Update and Opportunity to Help!

As longtime KAS members know, we continue to support permanent protection of the headwaters of Hunter Creek, Pistol River, the North Fork of the Smith, and the Illinois Rivers from the threat of strip mining. All these areas were temporarily withdrawn from new mining claims for 20 years with the 2017 Southwest Oregon “mineral withdrawal,” which gives Congress time to act on legislation. Last year, Senator Wyden combined the bill that would make this protection permanent with another bill to protect more wilderness on the Rogue River (between Galice and Marial, upstream in Josephine County) in new legislation called the Oregon Recreation Enhancement (ORE) Act. I am very glad to report that in December, Senator Wyden advanced the ORE Act through a markup in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. This is a critically important step toward making the protections we need permanent.
While it may seem that the push for mining has faded into the background with the 20-year mineral withdrawal in place, Red Flat Nickel Company (RFNC) continues to assert that it has valid existing claims in the headwaters of Hunter Creek that would be exempt from the mineral withdrawal. The Forest Service has yet to make a determination about the validity of the company’s claims. Moreover, on the national level, the mining industry continues to push Congress to roll back already lax regulations that govern hard rock mining, so we need to stay vigilant.
Meanwhile, Senator Merkley has introduced entirely different legislation to expand the Smith River National Recreation Area into Oregon, which would make permanent the mineral withdrawal for the watershed of the North Fork of the Smith River, located at the southern tip of the Kalmiopsis Wilderness.
We need to thank our senators for continuing to work to permanently protect the headwaters of our extra-ordinary wild rivers — so that they know we are still paying attention and that we still care. Senators Wyden and Merkley are cosponsors of both bills.

Please call with a simple message of thanks. Here is a sample script:
Thank you for your leadership in protecting South-west Oregon’s wild rivers from the threat of strip mining.
Senator Wyden, thank you for your work to advance the ORE Act, with the Southwest Oregon Mineral Withdrawal, through committee markup, and I hope you’ll keep working to get it passed.
Senator Merkley, thank you for introducing the bill to protect the North Fork Smith, and I hope you will also continue to support efforts to advance mineral withdrawals for our other cherished wild rivers through the ORE Act.
Senator Wyden: (202) 224-5244 / (541) 858-5122
Senator Merkley: (202) 224-3753 / (541) 608-9102
You can also send a brief thank you note through the senators’ websites.

Floras Lake Exchange, Brief Update

Last fall, both the Curry County Board of Commissioners (BOC) and the Oregon Parks and Recreation Commission (OPRC) voted to move forward with an exchange of 90 acres of inaccessible, county-owned land on Floras Lake (adjacent to Floras Lake Natural Area) and 33 acres of accessible, state-owned land on Highway 101 at the corner of Airport Road. Since we’ve been working toward a conservation outcome for the Floras Lake lands for nearly a decade, we are looking forward to celebrating! However, though the BOC signed an agreement on December 5, the ex-change is not yet complete. The agreement stipulates a closing date of December 31, 2020 — almost a year from now — and before then, the county needs to “vacate” all of the roads in the parcel to be ex-changed. The agreement stipulates that costs of this legal task will be split, with the state paying no more than $3,000 to get the job done. According to county staff, this final work has not yet been budgeted or scheduled and may require additional direction from the BOC. Given the difficulties and politics of getting the agreement signed, we intend to watchdog this until the job is truly complete.

Pistol River Gravel Extraction Project Update

In last quarter’s Storm Petrel, we reported that the Curry County Planning Commission (PC) had denied a proposal for gravel extraction along the lower Pistol River because the application lacked information required by law to inform a proper decision. We also reported that the project proponent had declined to appeal the decision. That was the best information available from the county when we went to press, but, shortly thereafter, he did, in fact, decide to appeal the decision to the Curry County Board of Commissioners.
Meanwhile, neighbors in Pistol River held two local gatherings — one convened by the project proponent and another by the project opponents. KAS was invited to participate in the second meeting, where the project proponent spoke about his desire to, in fact, restore the lower river. We were heartened to hear that and also to learn that the Curry Watersheds Partnership (which includes the South Coast Watershed Council and the Curry Soil and Watershed Conservation District) had already started to work with other willing landowners in the lower river to consider potential restoration projects. They had even submitted a grant proposal to fund hydrologic and sediment studies needed to determine how best to proceed and where gravel removal might be warranted for restoration purposes.
However, despite the hopeful rhetoric, when the BOC considered the appeal at a de novo hearing in mid-November, the proposal remained focused on taking out gravel and still lacked basic information about the amount of gravel to be removed and impacts to the estuary and to salmon. We urged the commissioners to encourage the project proponent to withdraw his appeal and work together with the watershed council to develop a restoration-oriented plan. The record was kept open for several weeks for additional information and rebuttals. Then on January 8, the BOC made a final decision, voting two to one to affirm the PC’s decision to deny the still-deficient proposal. Commissioner Boice voted against, wanting to keep the record open to allow the applicant still more time.
It is critical to carefully scrutinize projects proposed in and around the estuarine zones of our coastal rivers because these areas are especially important for fish that use them for migration, juvenile rearing, and even nursery habitat in the case of some marine species. Even if there is good habitat upstream, degraded estuary habitat can serve as a bottleneck for salmon runs. For this reason, anyone proposing a project in aquatic estuarine habitat must secure permits not on-ly from local government but also from state and federal agencies to assure that impacts to water quality and fish, especially threatened coho salmon, will be minimized.
At this point, the project proponent may decide to appeal the BOC decision to the state Land Use Board of Appeals. Otherwise, he will need to wait for a year to submit a new application to the county. We hope that he will work with a restoration consultant and Curry Watersheds Partnership to develop a proposal that could help to restore the lower Pistol River.

Jordan Cove LNG Terminal and Pipeline Update

In mid-November, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Pembina Corporation’s Jordan Cove Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) pipeline and terminal facility. The facility is proposed by a Canadian corporation to export American gas to Asia, condemning Oregonians’ land along the pipe-line route and building a dangerous facility squarely in a high-hazard earthquake and tsunami zone. Ac-cording to the FEIS, constructing and operating the LNG project would impact soil, water, wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, 15 threatened and endangered species, land use, recreation, landscape views, traffic, cultural resources, housing, air quality, and noise levels. In particular, the pipeline would cross more than 300 waterbodies, including the Rogue, Klamath, and Coos Rivers, and would require clearing of more than 2,000 acres of forest, including 750 acres of old-growth.
In mid-January, the National Marine Fisheries Ser-vice (NMFS) released a “biological opinion” (BiOp) that the project’s impacts would not jeopardize the long-term survival of any federally threatened or endangered species. The FEIS and BiOp are intended to inform FERCs final decision, which is expected next month.
Meanwhile, on the local front, the Coos Bay City Council on January 7 considered a proposal for dredging Coos Bay in order to accommodate massive ships that would service the proposed LNG facility at Jordan Cove. Analyzing the project as a contractor for the city, planning staff from the Lane Council of Governments determined the project was not in the “public interest” and recommended disapproval. Nevertheless, the city council’s vote was a tie, with three against and three in favor. Ultimately, the mayor broke the tie, tipping the balance for city approval of this part of the LNG plan.
A contingent of about nine KAS members attended the city council meeting to show opposition to this project that would degrade Coos Bay and commit us to another 30 years of burning fossil fuels. At a pre-meeting rally, retired Oregon Institute of Marine Biology scientist Alan Shanks explained to the crowd how the proposed dredging would bust into bedrock, permanently changing the flow of seawater in the bay in unknown ways. This could be disastrous for juvenile crabs that rely on the sheltered habitat for nursery grounds, an issue that has not been sufficiently analyzed, in his view. It is likely that the city council’s decision will be appealed. Keep in mind, too, that earlier this year, the state Department of Environmental Quality denied a critical clean water permit. As we go to press, there is big news that Pembina has withdrawn its application for a key state “dredge and fill” permit. Stay tuned for further news about this consequential project.

Port Orford “Dark Sky” Ordinance Ready for an Upgrade

Over the past several months, the Port Orford Planning Commission (PC) has been considering up-grades to Port Orford’s Dark Sky lighting ordinance. The intent of the ordinance is to keep light focused downward to the ground where it’s needed, preventing light pollution that would obscure the town’s beautiful starry night sky and light trespass that errantly falls onto neighbors’ properties.
The ordinance was first adopted in 2010 after many years of effort from KAS members, especially Al Geiser, who worked together with Coos-Curry Electric Cooperative, helping to install “night caps” on dozens of lights around town. An upgrade is now needed to address new LED technology, with new terms and units to describe light, such as Kelvins and lumens. Problems with enforceability also need to be addressed. The PC has drawn upon outdoor-lighting ordinances from a number of other small cities to develop language for this upgrade.
The ordinance was scheduled for consideration by the PC in mid-January but was bumped by a proposal to increase the height of the cell phone tower on Boot Hill Road. Thanks to all who turned out anyway to speak in favor of the lighting ordinance. At this point, the ordinance is expected to be considered at the PC meeting on February 11 at 3:30 p.m., but it’s important to check the agenda ahead of time, given that the schedule may change. After the ordinance is approved by the PC, it will be considered by the Port Orford City Council. We’ll need help from supporters at the city council meeting to ensure that the new ordinance will pass.
Some may take our beautiful night sky for granted in Curry County, but it’s important to note that fewer and fewer places in the world remain unaffected by light pollution. Beyond annoying neighbors and creating pink glare in the night sky, too much light at night has impacts on birds; seabirds such as storm petrels can be drawn to night lights like moths to a candle and become disoriented, with dire effect. Bright lights at night are also known to affect human health. For these reasons, many communities cherish their dark skies as a benefit to residents and visitors alike.

Forest Reforms Coming to the Ballot Box

For years, Oregonians concerned about insufficient riparian buffers for logging and aerial spraying of herbicides have tried to reform Oregon’s Forest Practices Act, the law that regulates forestry on private lands, but to little avail given the power of the timber industry. It’s well known that Oregon’s forestry rules are weaker than those in all surrounding states, including Idaho, so this past fall forest activists tried a new tack using the citizen ballot initiative process, aiming to put forest practice reforms directly to voters — in particular, expanded buffers for aerial spraying and logging around waterbodies. However, the secretary of state deemed the initiatives were too complex for the initiative process (and has been accused of siding with industry), and she threw them out. That decision was appealed in December. Mean-while, activists are aiming to place alternative provisions on the ballot for the 2020 election to accomplish similar goals.
Those of you who live in small watersheds know firsthand the risks of aerial spraying of herbicides and also how lack of buffer zones beside streams can lead to sedimentation that fills up pools and other-wise degrades aquatic habitat. The ballot initiatives will be a good opportunity to make headway on forest practice reforms that are critically important for public health, wildlife, and ecosystems. Below is info on an upcoming event about this — and we’ll keep you posted on more opportunities to support this effort.

Feb. 17, Monday, 6:30-8pm, Improving Protections for Forest Waters Workshop, Port Orford Public Library

Join us at this workshop to help citizens learn about shortcomings in Oregon’s current state forestry rules and upcoming ballot measures intended to improve them—by increasing buffers for logging and aerial spraying along streams. Come find out how you can help press for rules to better protect our streams and communities! 

Posted on

Good news on Floras Lake!

We are pleased to report that this past week, the Oregon State Parks Commission, at its meeting in Brookings, voted unanimously in favor of the Floras Lake land swap agreement. A BIG thanks to all the KAS members who attended and spoke in support. We’d very much hoped that vote would be our finish line, but it turns out that the county now wants to consider a few minor adjustments to the final agreement, and so there is yet ONE MORE MEETING, next Wednesday at 5pm in Port Orford at City Hall. Since our Brookings members helped out down in Brookings, it would be terrific to have a crew of North County KAS members to help cheerlead this one — dare I say it –over the actual finish line!  

Sept. 25, Wednesday, 5pm, Curry BOC considers Floras Lake Land Swap, Port Orford City Hall – The Curry Board of Commissioners will consider the final agreement for the Floras Lake land swap at its north county meeting next Wednesday. It’s not a lengthy agenda and the swap is early —so it shouldn’t take too long. Earlier this year, the Curry BOC decided to rotate its meeting location so as to hear from more people in more communities. The last time they came to Port Orford, it was small and fairly casual. The items under consideration in the agreement are asking the state to share costs associated with vacating the road right of ways within the property and also a reversionary clause if the state does not follow through on developing a trail plan within 2 years. I sure hope these piffling details don’t get in the way! This is a good opportunity to THANK the commissioners for supporting the swap and encouraging them to move ahead. If you want to see the agenda and final agreement (with verbiage under consideration), you can find them here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BXmbPx-GRPBj0jmGI9lcDbetB9O_9gkO